Home | Links | About The Author
 
Contents
 
 About Bible4Today
 
 Cooke's Tour of the Bible
 
 Through The Year
 January
 February
 March
 April
 May
 June
 July
 August
 September
 October
 November
 December
 
 A Word in Time
 
 Bible Bloopers
 
 Just A Minute
 
 DIY Homegroup Studies
 
 Mind Stretchers

Search

Through The Year : October


October 19th
Click here to play audio file
Email this article
 Printer friendly page
We have been appreciating the work of St. Luke this last couple of days. It's time we read once again, in Luke's own words the reason why he wrote the third gospel.
Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things which have been fulfilled among us, just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eye-witnesses and servants of the word. Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught. Luke 1: 1-4
In the original language in which Luke wrote, it is most polished, beautifully constructed and stylish Greek one could read. Then he goes on in the next verse "In the time of Herod the King of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah ..." and so his matchless story continues, not in the opening polished, academic style, but in the clear factual lines of the story teller, the reporter. This preface tells us such a lot about Luke's aims and methods. Let's pick out one or two:
He had researched other accounts of the story of Jesus, and wrote to deepen and broaden and improve our picture of Jesus.
He was not himself a physical eye-witness of the great Jesus-events, but he knew and went to interview those who were. He is reporting the words of the eye-witness, like a devoted detective.
He researched and recorded his material accurately. Early in this century two modern scholars, believing that Luke had got some things wrong, went to the Mediterranean world to check out his work. They selected six of Luke's statements, in which they believed he'd got things wrong. They eventually emerged from their detective work to confess that in every instance it was their doubts which were wrong. Luke was correct.
He was an accurate and systematic historian, as he justly claimed, refusing to be conditioned by his non-Hebrew culture.
Both his volumes (the third Gospel and Acts of the Apostles) are dedicated to a certain "Theophilus", of whom we know nothing, except that both Theophilus and Luke are non-Jewish names.He as writing for a wider world than Palestine.
He does not assume that his readers knew anything about the Old Testament, or Jewish theology and teaching. In short he wrote for gentiles, for the whole wide world, and for us.
Here is but one tiny example of Luke's thoroughness in recording those who actually walked with Jesus on his travelling missions:
The twelve were with him, and also some women who had been cured of evil spirits and diseases: Mary (called Magdalene) from whom seven demons had come out; Joanna the wife of Chuza, the manager of Herod's household; Susanna; and many others. These women were helping to support them out of their own means. Luke 8: 1c, 2-3
A Prayer:
Today, Lord, I thank you for the work of faithful Christian scholars who love you and your word.
Now read Luke Chapter 3.






Top of Page

October
Latest Articles
October 1st
October 2nd
October 3rd
October 4th
October 5th
October 6th
October 7th
October 8th
October 9th
October 10th